October 2014 - Rizio Hamilton & Kane P.C.

Tragedy Avoided: Uninsured and Under Insured Motorist Coverage

In Pennsylvania, we are only required to carry $15,000 worth of bodily injury coverage. Car accident lawyers call it a minimum policy or a 15/30 policy. This means that if YOU cause an accident, and OTHERS are injured, with your minimum policy, the injured person would receive up to $15,000 for his or her injuries, no matter how severe the injuries are. In the event that more than one person is injured, they would be able to receive up to $30,000 total (split up according to each person’s injury). Ok, so, that doesn’t seem so horrible.

Now, let’s flip the scenario around. Let’s say “Bob” has a minimum policy, runs a red light, and strikes your car. You were in the ICU for four days, suffered two broken legs, broken ribs, a punctured lung and head trauma. Your hospital bill alone is over $50,000. Not to mention the fact that you lost your job, you need physical therapy, and you have no way to pay your mortgage or car payment. You will only to be able to recover $15,000, UNLESS, you selected uninsured/under insured motorist coverage (UM/UIM) on YOUR auto insurance policy. UM/UIM coverage saves the day!

UM/UIM coverage protects you from drivers who are not insured (in Philadelphia, that could be close to half of the drivers you encounter) or drivers those who carry minimum policies.   It is NOT expensive, and it is NECESSARY.  If you have children, especially teenagers, you need UM/UIM coverage. Your UM/UIM coverage generally extends to your resident relatives, or your family members that live with you.

So, let’s look at the teenage child example. Your daughter is a passenger in her boyfriend’s car, when he loses control and strikes a tree, severely injuring your daughter. Your daughter’s boyfriend only has a minimum policy (mmm…shocker). You hire a car accident lawyer. The car accident lawyer pursues a case against your daughter’s boyfriend. Actually, against his insurance company. (**Remember, the insurance company defends the case and pays the settlement or judgment, not the individual.**)

OPTION A: if you do NOT have UM/UIM, you can only receive $15,000, which, after liens and expenses, may not even pay for her tutors to help her catch up with her schoolwork.

OPTION B: if you do have UM/UIM, then you can recover the $15,000 from the boyfriend’s insurance PLUS the difference from your UM/UIM. So, if you have a $100,000 UM/UIM policy, and you have two vehicles, stacked, (stacking increases the coverage by the number of cars you have on the policy – a $100,000 UIM policy with two cars is $200,000 worth of UIM coverage) then you may receive up to $185,000 to make up for the boyfriend’s lack of coverage.

I think we would all choose OPTION B. Now, take a look at your policy to make sure you have included UM/UIM in your auto insurance! If you are not sure, call one of our car accident lawyers, and they can help evaluate your situation in a FREE consultation.

 

Car Accident Attorney: Full Tort or Limited Tort

So, you were in a car accident, and your car accident attorney asks you whether you are Full Tort or Limited Tort. What on earth does that mean?

Most of our clients think that Full Tort means Full Coverage, which is very far from the truth. If you selected Limited Tort, which most people do, because the premium is less for the Limited Tort option, then you CANNOT recover for the pain and suffering that you endured as a result of your car accident unless you prove that you have suffered a serious impairment of a bodily function, permanent disfigurement or death. That’s a pretty tough threshold to meet. You can recover for economic damages or out-of-pocket expenses, like your medical bills and wage loss. However, you will not be able to recover beyond those numbers.

There are some exceptions to the Limited Tort rule, such as being struck by a drunk driver, or being struck by an out-of-state registered vehicle. But, for the most part, those exceptions are fairly rare. Seek out an experienced car accident attorney, because Limited Tort cases can be complex. And you will need an attorney well versed in auto law in order to argue that you can meet the Limited Tort threshold. In all honesty, most car accident attorneys will not touch Limited Tort Cases.

So, what should you do now? It is extremely important for you to review your auto insurance policy. Look at your Declarations page, and check for your Tort option. Most often, your insurance agent just gave you a few quotes, and you picked the one that best fit your budget, without realizing the ramifications of your choice. Nuances of insurance policies are rarely explained to the customer, which is one reason why PA’s Tort option can be so unfair to the insured. You may have had absolutely no idea of the magnitude of the rights that you waived when you purchased your policy.

The amount of money that you could lose as a result of opting for Limited Tort insurance is far more than paying a little more each month in premiums. Also, don’t forget that your Tort option will extend to your family members, such as your children or other relatives in your home. We have had several cases where parents are devastated when they realize that their child will be unable to recover because of their Limited Tort option.

Remember, request a copy of your policy, and ask lost of questions. The best decision is an informed decision. Call one of our experienced car accident attorneys to figure out whether you are Limited Tort, and if so, whether you can get over the Limited Tort threshold.

Defective Guardrails Causing Injury and Death

All across America, highways are lined with Trinity Industries’ guardrails. It has come to the attention of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that these guardrails are actually piercing vehicles and slicing into occupants. The injuries from these guardrails include severed limbs and death.

How is it possible that something that is designed to protect people is actually injuring and killing people? Apparently, the guardrail manufacturer made the decision to shorten a piece of metal on the end of the guardrail from 5 inches to 4 inches, creating a savings for their company of $2 per piece, totaling $50,000 per year. This modification, according to victims, changes the way the guardrail absorbs impact. So, instead of ribboning upon impact, the guardrail locks up, and slices through the vehicle.

The subject guardrails were only approved by the FHWA with the 5 inch metal piece. Trinity Industries failed to disclose the 4 inch modification to the government. The rails were installed in states without their approval of the modification. As a result, four states have already halted the use of the guardrail. Will Pennsylvania do the same? We don’t know. But we do know that these guardrails are installed on PA roads. There has already been at least one Pennsylvanian injured. She lost her leg in a crash.

A Texas jury recently found against Trinity industries, and awarded $175 million in damages, most of which goes to the government. The jury determined that Trinity defrauded the government when it sold modified guardrails to states without disclosing the modification. Trinity Industries will appeal the jury’s determination. Meanwhile, the recent news coverage only serves to aid injury attorneys across the country in their representation of those injured or killed by the guardrails.

Car Accident Attorney – Defective Airbags

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued a consumer advisory on October 20, 2014, urging owners of numerous models of Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Mazda, BMW and GM vehicles to heed recall notices immediately. The vehicles listed in the consumer advisory were recalled because they may contain defective Takata made airbags, which have caused several deaths around the country. The faulty airbags essentially explode at the time of a crash because the propellant inside the airbag burns too hot, ruptures its container, and sends metal parts flying into the face and chest of the very person it is intended to protect. According to The New York Times, the wounds from the defective airbags resemble stab wounds.

The problem is so bad that Toyota is warning owners of the vehicles listed in the recall not to allow passengers to ride in the front seat. While Honda does not have the parts it needs to fix the problem and make its cars safe for occupants. Apparently, Honda is only sending out recall warnings as the parts to fix the problem become available.

It is unclear whether the problem only occurs in high humidity areas; however, high humidity areas have taken priority on the recall list.

From a legal standpoint, Takata and the applicable car manufacturer will probably point the finger at each other, which could actually make litigation favorable for the plaintiff. Some important questions in any litigation about this major safety issue will be whether the car manufacturer and Takata knew about the defect, and for how long, how swift was the recall, and whether current warnings are adequate. What kind of testing did Takata do on the airbags? It would definitely be interesting to see the communications between the airbag manufacturer and the car manufacturer in connection with the defective airbags. Either way, from a products liability standpoint, we all know that something designed to protect should not become something that kills.

One thing is for sure: if you own a vehicle on the recall list, make sure to immediately send your vehicle in for the necessary repairs! Protect yourself, your family and your friends by not allowing anyone to ride in the front seat until you take your car to be repaired. Of course, if there is a faulty airbag on the driver’s side, the driver will not be protected until the necessary fix is implemented.  Go to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration website at www.nhtsa.gov and search for the recall list to see if your vehicle could contain a defective airbag.

If you were injured in an accident, and need to speak to a car accident attorney, call us today.  One of our car accident attorneys will give you a free consultation.

Testimonial

“Anytime and everytime I need legal help, my choice is Rizio, Hamilton & Kane. With them, my concerns become theirs. THEY fight for you, and they win!!! I recommend to anyone who needs an attorney, choose Rizio, Hamilton & Kane…”

-S.J.

“5 out of 5 … RH&K was great and fast on my lawsuit!”

-S.S.

“A HUGE thanks to Mike Kane and all the staff for helping me out with my case. I couldn’t be happier with the team, their hard work, or the outcome!”

-S.S.

“The best of the best. Very good attorneys…..highly recommend this firm – especially Mike Kane.”

-M.M.

Get a FREE Consultation!

  • Please verify that you read the disclaimer
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Verified by MonsterInsights